Investors Seek Class Certification Against Fitbit

Investors Seek Class Certification Against Fitbit

Investors of the popular fitness tracker Fitbit were in court arguing that Fitbit covered up problems with its technology, which led to an inflated stock price. Once the truth about technology problems was revealed, it adversely affected investors.

A group of investors who purchased shares of Fitbit in the company’s June 2015 initial public offering (IPO) are seeking to66 represent a larger “class”  –  anyone who bought shares in the IPO and have lost money as a result of statements relied upon by the company in advance of their purchase, and those who bought shares in the IPO through May 2016, when relevant information about the company’s technology came to light.

According to the plaintiffs, Fitbit misled investors both before and after its 2015 IPO by telling the public their proprietary algorithms “accurately measure and analyze user health and fitness metrics” despite knowing that issues existed.

The shareholder suit arose after users started complaining that Fitbit devices provided “wildly inaccurate” results, especially during periods of intense exercise. News of the issues caused the stock to drop from nearly $31 to just under $14 from January through May of 2016.

Board Members Named in Lawsuit

The lawsuits also name the company CEO and Chairman James Park, CFO William Zerella and CTO Eric Friedman. A motion to dismiss was denied last October and again in part in January, with the judge ruling the shareholders’ claims were strong enough to survive and proceed.

Are you involved in the Class Certification Against Fitbit?

If you invested in Fitbit, you may have certain legal rights that require your immediate attention.

Call a Los Angeles Securities Fraud Attorney Today

Contact an experienced Los Angeles securities fraud attorney today for a consultation to discuss your rights and options.

LeapFrog Investor Lawsuit Moves Forward in California.

LeapFrog Investor Lawsuit Moves Forward

A California federal judge is moving forward with a proposed LeapFrog investor lawsuit. The class action accuses the children’s educational game manufacturer LeapFrog Enterprises Inc. – along with its top executives – of hiding demand and inventory issues that caused executives to issue a $36.5 million asset write-down.

Last September, investors alleged in their amended complaint that the LeapFrog CEO and chief financial officer were overly optimistic about earnings expectations and other financial matters. This past week, the judge dismissed part of the LeapFrog investor lawsuit, but said investors adequately pled claims that LeapFrog told investors that its long-term assets were not impaired – only to announce the multimillion-dollar write down shortly thereafter.

In a matter of only two months, executives “failed to explain why…they changed their view on long-lived assets from no impairment to a 96% impairment,” according to the judge’s written order.

Litigation began in 2015 after the company announced that its third quarter results were lower than anticipated. As a result, shareholders felt that the company kept share prices artificially high by concealing logistical issues plaguing the launch of its new LeapTV video game system, and failing to report that many of their products were not selling.

Involved in the LeapFrog Investor Lawsuit?

If you invested with LeapFrog Enterprises Inc. or invested in another company that kept material information from you and you experienced a loss as a result, you may have certain legal rights that require your immediate attention.

Call a Los Angeles Securities Fraud Attorney Today

Contact an experienced Los Angeles securities fraud attorney today for a consultation to discuss your rights and options.