The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the appeal of a man convicted for insider trading, taking up the question of what sort of personal benefit needs to be shown in order to hold someone liable for trading on inside information.
Bassam Salman was convicted of trading on insider information learned from a close friend, who in turn received the information from his brother, a former investment banker. At issue here is whether it is enough for the government to allege that the tipper and tippee shared a close familial relationship for grounds to exist for insider trading charges.
Salman alleges that the government showed no proof that Michael Kara bestowed any benefit on his brother, Maher Kara, for the information received, which is the standard in the Second Circuit, in the now famous Newman case.
In the Ninth Circuit, where Salman’s case was heard, the conviction was upheld on the ground that the information was a gift, which is in with a 1983 Supreme Court holding on insider trading. Salman is asking the court to resolve the split, and if there always needs to be an exchange of significant personal benefit or if it is enough for an insider to simply have a close family relationship with the tippee.
This will be the court’s first insider trading case in more than three decades, and only a few months after the Court declined to hear the Newman appeal from the Second Circuit.
Call a Los Angeles Securities Attorney Today
If you have been charged with trading on insider information, you may have certain legal rights that require your immediate attention. Contact an experienced Los Angeles securities attorney as soon as possible to discuss your rights.